Blog Archive

Saturday, July 31, 2010

Ed Tech Experts Choose Top 3 Tools (link to the article) and my thoughts (top 3)

Ten years into the new century, we’re still trying to find the web 2.0 tools that best facilitate collaboration—one of the fundamentals of 21st century learning. As the number of tools continues to grow, and fuzzy terms like cloud computing, hashtags, and synchronous live platforms are introduced into the lexicon daily, even the most tech-savvy educators can have trouble determining which technologies have a role in a collaborative academic environment and which are simply new toys.
http://thejournal.com/Articles/2010/08/01/3-for-3.aspx?Page=1
This is in no way a review, critique or criticism of the article from the Journal. I think that each person brings great discussion and ideas to the edu-sphere and I am grateful for that. I would just like to add to the conversation and give my 3 top tools.
I love that Steve Hargadon, didn't give a name of a tool, but instead the idea. Blogs, for example, if you use wordpress, blogger, edublogs, or any number of others, that's great, the idea of the web log is still the "tool" though.

So my number one would also be blogging...still. I love the idea of creating authors, publishers. and writers with purpose without really having to change a classroom, as we know many teachers aren't ready for this. Blogging can be a literal, adaptive, and also transformative use of technology. It allows for scaffolded and secure use, while naturally lending itself to differentiation in the classroom. 
A teacher with little or no tech skills can begin blogging with kids in a safe environment, dangling the carrot and opening doors of digital responsibility, footprints, and authentic publishing. 

My number two would be community as content. Yeah, I know that sounds obscure, and I can't link One single tool to it directly, but I can say that leveraging the 100's of web 2.0 tools out there into a means of changing classroom practice can and should be a priority. Today, you can literally walk into your class, state three objectives, give a timeline, and then allow the collaboration and conversation to fill the annals. Social networks open doors previously unimagined, Skype invites authors and experts into rooms, and backchannels, blogs, and live document collaboration (Google Docs recent updates and purchase of etherpad make this THE tool) changes and guides learning. Learning becomes more about who you know, how you can contribute, when to shut up and listen or lurk, and then pushback or modify. Which leads me to my number three Open-ness.

Open-ness, yeah that's what I'm calling it today, is high potential, somewhat controversial, and potentially culture changing. Take anything we do on the web, tear down the walls and let others glean, modify and adapt; and what you have is a culture that grows exponentially and rapidly.  Creative commons has done so much heavy lifting around this that it's time to run with it, especially in education. (btw-- the recent ruling on jailbreaking iphones opened some doors in edu) Open building, sharing, and designing of content will do wonders in closing divides between haves and have nots and do wonders for our enabling and empowering of our future creators. I've written about this before, here, but I really believe open course, open sharing, open content, and open communication will give us the transparency that everyone seems to claim they grant and expect!

Thoughts?

Posted via email from Michael Wacker's posterous

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Re-reading some old blogpost faves this AM and this one by @karlfisch stuck out to me....

Below is an excerpt from a post by Karl Fisch back in 2006, linked to a "most influential post" of 2007. Three almost Four years later are we any closer to answering the question? Take some time to read through the comments, see if, like me, you find yourself saying; "Wow, I still have these conversations pretty daily if not weekly'

When is it going to change?

http://thefischbowl.blogspot.com/2007/09/is-it-okay-to-be-technologically.html

I think there's a general feeling among teachers (not all teachers, but many) that it's okay to be technologically illiterate. It reminds me of when I was a math teacher. In about 80% of the parent conferences I had with students who were struggling, at least one of the parents would say "I was never any good at math either." While I don't doubt the truth of the statement, it was the fact that they said it and almost seemed proud of it that bothered me (and of course the message it sent to their student). I can't imagine a parent saying "Oh, yeah, I never learned how to read" and being proud of it.

When are we going to unlock computers so that adlt can play, download, and learn how to use these tools better? When will we enable and celebrate the opportunity for failure in regards to technology. I sent a video yesterday to a tecaher who was so frustrated by the fact that she was gong to need to get her site tech or central tech support to download Quicktime, that her exact words were:

So I downloaded the file and then I couldn’t run it because I don’t have a media player on this computer. When I tried to download one, I found that I don’t have administrative rights to download a new program. I have sent a request to the Hotline to become an administrator. Ahhhhh technology, so much fun, such a pain.

It shouldn't have to be that way! Especially if we can draw comparisons between technology skills, and reading or writing; do we make it this hard for tecahers to check out books? Is that eve a fair comparison, if not what parallel can you see?

Here's a final nugget from Karl's post four years ago, I think it sparks great conversation and debate.

If a teacher today is not technologically literate - and is unwilling to make the effort to learn more - it's equivalent to a teacher 30 years ago who didn't know how to read and write.

 

Posted via email from mwacker's posterous

Friday, July 16, 2010

Learning Management System...Blackboard has it all? Who pays the price?

Last week Blackboard announced that they had purchased what in my opinion are the two most dynamic e-learning tools available today, Wimba and Elluminate.
Yesterday they announced the addition of powerful e-learning texts;
“McGraw-Hill, a top academic publisher, as well as Follett Higher Education Group and Barnes Noble, two major distributors that operate a combined 1,500 college bookstores in the United States and Canada.”
For me this is a tough pill to swallow; not because a big company is getting bigger, creating a virtual monopoly on the Learning Management System business, but because I believe in Open Source as a viable, sustainable model for education. These acquisitions help to facilitate the delivery of dynamic content and synchronous and asynchronous deliveries via online, but a cost that is prohibitive for most districts and schools.
The McGraw-Hill partnership <http://www.blackboard.com/Company/Media-Center/Press-Releases.aspx?releaseid=1447807> will allow instructors to search the McGraw-Hill catalog for relevant course materials, then assign them to their students, without ever leaving Blackboard. Students can then purchase and access the assigned materials, also through the Blackboard portal, via the Follett and Barnes & Noble online bookstores.
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/07/15/blackboard

I want to believe that the open source community will close the gap and continue to build better and more dynamic venues/tools for video conferencing (big blue button), e-text delivery (ck-12) and more venues for open content (MIT Open courseware); because I think that it's what is best for our schools. I'm not opposed to paying for tools, but I know there are far too many districts in my state that will NEVER be able to afford an LMS like this, and for those kids I want it open and accessible. So who pays the price when big companies get bigger? The rural outliers, the schools and communities where digital access and inequity isn't just a rallying cry for more tax money, but is instead a reality, a crippling reality where preparing our p-12 students for college, creative entrepeneurship, or life beyond high school, just got a little bit tougher and more expensive.
There are people working hard to get these tools into the hands of schools and districts slashing costs and trying to balance budgets, and i'm sure there are many more besides the few listed above, but if you want to learn a little more about them you can find them here.


E-texts
  • CK-12 Foundation is a non-profit organization with a mission to reduce the cost of textbook materials for the K-12 market both in the U.S. and worldwide. Using an open-content, web-based collaborative model termed the "FlexBook," CK-12 intends to pioneer the generation and distribution of high quality educational content that will serve both as core text as well as provide an adaptive environment for learning.
    http://about.ck12.org
Video Conferencing
Open course
  • MIT Open Course: Unlocking Knowledge, Empowering Minds. Free lecture notes, exams, and videos from MIT. No registration required. http://ocw.mit.edu/index.htm
Open Source LMS
  • Moodle: Moodle is a Course Management System (CMS), also known as a Learning Management System (LMS) or a Virtual Learning Environment (VLE). It is a Free web application that educators can use to create effective online learning sites http://moodle.org
  • EDU20 Free and easy LMS. Free cloud-hosted LMS, with nothing to download or install.
    http://www.edu20.org